What is Passive House?
Passive House is the world’s most rigorous home energy performance standard. What does this mean? Compared to conventional homes built today, Passive House-certified homes use 80-90% less energy, with only modest cost premium.
The standard is fixated around three main performance goals:
- Less than < 4.75 kBTU/ft2/year towards heating and cooling (each)
- Air infiltration of less than or equal to 0.6 Air Changes/Hour at a pressure of 50 pascals
- Total source energy use < 38kbtu/ft2/year
Because these are performance goals, there exist any number of combinations of wall sections, design features, window packages, and active systems that could achieve these goals.
Passive House criteria are not only based in energy performance. They also account for occupant comfort and health; for example, interior temperatures should not vary by more than 4-5 degrees between perimeter areas (i.e. next to a window) and more central spaces. Minimizing the temperature differences greatly reduces convective movement, which eliminates drafts. Furthermore, healthy indoor air quality is maintained by providing at least 18 cubic feet per minute (cfm) per person of continuous fresh air ventilation, which exhausting the kitchens and bathrooms at a prescriptive rate (35 and 25 cfm continuously, respectively). In total, all of the air in the house will be completely replaced every 3 hours.
Homes are certified by the Passive House Institute via Certified Passive House Consultants, who must pass rigorous training and certification exams and subsequently work with project teams during the design process and verify compliance upon construction completion.
We are proud to pursue the Passive House criteria on the Little Compton project and hope the project inspires others like it.
How does a Passive House achieve such high levels of performance?
Passive Houses achieve their rigorous performance level through careful engineering and design. Because the standard is so stringent, one cannot simply “use their gut” to assemble the parts; rather, a trained designer must run multiple iterations of a complex energy model to assess the home’s performance. In this sense, Passive Houses require a great deal more of upfront planning and design prior to construction.
In a northern climate such as Little Compton, the hardest criteria to achieve is the heating energy per square foot requirement. The Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) is the model that is used to predict performance of the home. No amount of heat loss is unimportant in the Passive House paradigm—every thermal bridge, window, window location, shading device, etc is calculated.
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
I find this extremely interesting and look forward to checking on the progress of this house. I hope to someday build my own Passive House.
I am a firm believer in Passive Solar homes. Marrying design, solar orientation and site are keys to a successful passive solar home. One must also use quality craftsmanship, and quality materials preferably using sustainable design/construction/materials to meet the end goals. One must not forget common sense and using one’s own brain in determining these procedures.
Going to the property at different times of the day gives a true understanding of the site and the solar gain and how the site and the design will interact with eachother. Computers are a great tool but human contact with the site is key to a successful passive solar home.
Maria, couldn’t agree with you more. We’ve found that design alone a passive house does not make. Same for quality construction. Both are critical and taking a
Regarding the human connection with the site–this is important for any building. The computer models allow the design/build team to plan a cost-efficient way towards meeting the high performance level of passive house. An additional perk of high performance is exceptional year round comfort for the home’s occupants–a real win-win.
Really cool. (and warm!) ;o)
I’m rebuilding after a fire, and I am determined to build as passive/energy efficiently as possible. Thanks!